Chaetomorpha Antennia Extract as a Green Inhibitor for Corrosiono Brass in 0.1 N Phosphoric AcidSolution

R. Selva Kumar^1,2 and V. Chandrasekaran³

¹Research Scholar (PT), Department of Chemistry, Bharathiar University, Coimbatore-641 046, Tamil Nadu, India.

²Department of Chemistry, Sree Krishna Polytechnic College, Nagercoil-629 003, Tamilnadu, India.

³Department of Chemistry, Govt. Arts College (Autonomous), Salem – 636 007, Tamilnadu, India. 

For correspondence:

Email: rselvakumar86@yahoo.com

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/msri/120112

ABSTRACT:

The effect of marine algae Chaetomorpha antennia extract on corrosion inhibition of brass in phosphoric acid was investigated by weight-loss method, potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies. The inhibition efficiency is found to increase with increasing concentration of extract and decreases with rise in temperature. The activation energy, thermodynamic parameters (free energy, enthalpy and entropy change) and kinetic parameters (rate constant and half-life) for inhibition process were calculated. These thermodynamic and kinetic parameters indicate a strong interaction between the inhibitor and the brass surface. The inhibition is assumed to occur via adsorption of inhibitor molecules on the brass surface, which obeys Temkin adsorption isotherm. The adsorption of inhibitor on the brass surface is exothermic, physical, and spontaneous, follows first order kinetics. The polarization measurements showed that the inhibitor behaves as a mixed type inhibitor and the higher inhibition surface coverage on the brass was predicted. Inhibition efficiency values were found to show good trend with weight-loss method, potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies. SEM was carried out to ascertain the inhibitive nature of the algal extract on the brass surface.

KEYWORDS: Brass; Phosphoric acid; Chaetomorpha antennia; Inhibition; Isotherm

Copy the following to cite this article: Kumar R. S, Chandrasekaran V. Chaetomorpha Antennia Extract as a Green Inhibitor for Corrosiono Brass in 0.1 N Phosphoric Acid Solution. Mat.Sci.Res.India;12(1)

Copy the following to cite this URL: Kumar R. S, Chandrasekaran V. Chaetomorpha Antennia Extract as a Green Inhibitor for Corrosiono Brass in 0.1 N Phosphoric Acid Solution. Mat.Sci.Res.India;12(1). Available from: http://www.materialsciencejournal.org/?p=1762

Introduction

Phosphoric acid (H₃PO₄) is a major chemical product, which has many important uses especially in the production of fertilizers. Most of the acid is produced from phosphate rock by wet process. Brass and stainless steel are frequently used in many parts of the wet process and a considerable quantity of data has been published about the resistance of these materials to corrosion by acid solutions [1,2]. Most of the previous studies were focused on the inhibition of metals in HCl or H₂SO₄ solutions using organic compounds containing N, S, O atoms as corrosion inhibitors [3-5]. A lot of research has been done with naturally occurring substances since they are known to be eco-friendly and with little or no side effect on the humans. Among the naturally occurring substances reported in the corrosion study of metals like brass, aluminium, tin and mild steel, there leave extracts, gums and exudates, dyes, oils from plant materials, plant seeds and fruits, and anti-bacterial drugs. Plant extracts like the extract of cocos nucifera-coconut palm-petiole [6]; Musa Paradisiaca [7]; Mentha Pulegium [8]; Treculia Africana leaves [9] and Lupinus varius leaves [10]  have been studied and established their corrosion inhibition effects. They were all found to be good corrosion inhibitors with no effect on the environment.

In this study, the effect of addition of marine algae Chaetomorpha antennia extract on corrosion inhibition of brass in 0.1 N phosphoric acid solutions at different temperatures and various time intervals have been investigated by weight-loss method, potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies. The weight loss measurements aimed to predict the inhibition efficiency on brass corrosion and the adsorption isotherm, thermodynamic and kinetic feasibility of inhibition via surface coverage on brass by adsorbed extract. The inhibition type and inhibition efficiency were determined from the polarization measurements and impedance spectroscopy studies. SEM was carried out to ascertain the inhibitive nature of the algal extract on the brass surface.

Meterial and Methods

Materials

The chemical composition (weight percent) of the brass used in the present study was 71.5 % Cu, 28.38 % Zn, 0.07 % Pb, and 0.05 % Fe. The geometry of the specimens for weight-loss experiments was as follows: The brass specimens were polished mechanically with different grades of emery papers (1/0 to 4/0) and were thoroughly washed with double distilled water then degreased in acetone and dried. The solutions were prepared from analar grade chemicals using double distilled water. Phosphoric acid solution (H₃PO₄) was used as a corrosion medium. The inhibitor Chaetomorpha antennia extract (CAE) was extracted with ethanol using soxhelt extractor from marine algae Chaetomorpha antennia.

Weigh-loss Measurement

Measurements of weight changes were performed with rectangular brass specimens (length: 5 cm, width: 1 cm, and thickness: 0.3 cm). The specimens with same dimensions were immersed in 100 ml of 0.1 N H₃PO₄ solutions with and without different concentrations (0.0001 % to 0.0005 %) of CAE and allowed stand for 3 h and 6 h at various temperatures were as follows: 300 K, 318 K, 328 K, and 338 K. At 300 K the specimens were immersed for immersion time of 24, 48, 72, and 96 h. Then, the specimens were rinsed with distilled water and adherent corrosion products for 20 s, then the specimens were rinsed with water, cleaned with acetone and dried. The percentage of inhibition efficiency (IE) over the exposure period was calculated using the following equation [11]:

 

where W_o and W_i are the rate of corrosion for brass with and without inhibitor, respectively.

Potentiodynamic Polarization Studies

The potentiodynamic polarization studies were carried out with brass strips having an exposed area of 1 cm². The cell assembly consisted of brass as working electrode, a platinum foil as counter electrode and a saturated calomel electrode as a reference electrode. Polarization studies were carried out using a potentiostat/galvanostat (Model BAS-100A) at 300 K. The working electrode was immersed in a 0.1 N H₃PO₄ and allowed to stabilize for 30 min. Each electrode was immersed in a 0.1 N H₃PO₄ in the presence and absence of different concentrations of inhibitor to which a current of 1.5 mA/cm² was applied for 20 minutes to reduce oxides. The cathodic and anodic polarization curves for brass specimen in the test solution with and without various concentrations of the inhibitor were recorded by scanning the potential range +200 from the corrosion potential at a sweep rate of 1 mV/s. The inhibition efficiencies were determined from corrosion currents using the Tafel extrapolation method. The corrosion inhibition efficiency was calculated using the following equation (2) [19]:

where i_corr and i_corr(i) are the corrosion current density values without and with inhibitor, respectively.

Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies

The electrochemical impedance spectroscopy measurements are carried out with well polished brass electrode introduced into 100 ml of test solution using a Solartron electrochemical measurement unit (1280 B). After the determination of the steady-state current at a corrosion potential, sine wave voltage (10 mV) peak to peak, at frequencies between 10 MHz and 10 KHz are superimposed on the rest potential. Computer programs automatically controlled the measurements performed at rest potential after 30 minutes of exposure at 300 K. The impedance diagrams are given in the Nyquist representation. The charge transfer resistance (R_ct) and double layer capacitance (C_dl) values were calculated from the Nyquist plot.

The charge transfer resistance values were obtained from the plots of Z’ vs Z”.  The values of (R_s + R_ct) correspond to the point where the plots cuts Z’ axis at low frequency and R_s corresponds to the point where the plot cuts Z’ axis at high frequency. The difference between R_ct and R_s values give the charge transfer resistance (R_ct) values.  The C_dl values were obtained by the following equation (3) [8]:

 

where C_dl is double layer capacitance, R_ct is charge transfer resistance and  f_max  is frequency at Z” value maximum.

The corrosion inhibition efficiency was calculated using the following equation (4):

where R_ct andR_ct(i) are the charge transfer resistance in the absence and presence of inhibitor respectively.

Scanning electron microscope study

The brass specimen was immersed in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ in the presence and absence of CAE for 6 h at 300 K.  After 6 h the specimen was taken out and SEM images were recorded with a Hitachi 3000 H microscope from the dried film formed on the surface of the brass specimens.

Results and discussion

Weigh-loss method  

Table 1 shows the inhibition efficiency values of brass in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ with different concentrations of CAE in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ for different immersion times and temperatures. It has been observed that the IE increases with increase in concentration of CAE and decreases with increase in temperature and immersion time. The maximum IE (94.73 %) of inhibitor was achieved at 0.0005 % of inhibitor at 300 K for 3 h. This result suggests that an increase in extract concentration increases the number of inhibitor molecules absorbed on the brass surface and reduces the surface area that is available for the direct acid attack on the metal surface [8].

Table 2 – Calculated activation energy (E_a), free energy of adsorption (∆G_ads), enthalpy change (∆H), entropy change (∆S) values for CAE on brass corrosion in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ at 300 K

Conc. of inhibitor (%)	For 3 h		For 6 h		At 300 K
	SC (θ)	IE (%)	SC (θ)	IE (%)	SC (θ)	IE (%)
	300 K				For 24 h
Blank	0	0	0	0	0	0
0.0001	0.4737	47.37	0.3846	38.46	0.4546	45.46
0.0002	0.5790	57.90	0.4231	42.31	0.4805	48.05
0.0003	0.7368	73.68	0.4615	46.15	0.5195	51.95
0.0004	0.8421	84.21	0.6154	61.54	0.5714	57.14
0.0005	0.9473	94.73	0.7692	76.92	0.6364	63.64
	318 K				For 48 h
Blank	0	0	0	0	0	0
0.0001	0.4286	42.86	0.3030	30.30	0.2921	29.21
0.0002	0.5238	52.38	0.3939	39.39	0.3146	31.46
0.0003	0.6191	61.91	0.4546	45.46	0.3315	33.15
0.0004	0.6667	66.67	0.5152	51.52	0.3820	38.20
0.0005	0.8095	80.95	0.6364	63.64	0.4607	46.07
	328 K				For 72 h
Blank	0	0	0	0	0	0
0.0001	0.3750	37.50	0.2321	23.21	0.2447	24.47
0.0002	0.5000	50.00	0.2857	28.57	0.2700	27.00
0.0003	0.5833	58.33	0.3214	32.14	0.2827	28.27
0.0004	0.6250	62.50	0.3571	35.71	0.3291	32.91
0.0005	0.7500	75.00	0.4643	46.43	0.3882	38.82
	338 K				For 96 h
Blank	0	0	0	0	0	0
0.0001	0.3235	32.35	0.2239	22.39	0.1824	18.24
0.0002	0.4118	41.18	0.2537	25.37	0.1976	19.76
0.0003	0.4706	47.06	0.2836	28.36	0.2097	20.97
0.0004	0.5882	58.82	0.3284	32.84	0.2432	24.32
0.0005	0.6765	67.65	0.4328	43.28	0.3009	30.09

 

Thermodynamic and kinetic analysis

Activation energy

In order to elucidate the inhibitive properties of the inhibitor and the temperature dependence on the corrosion rates, the energy of activation for the corrosion process in the absence and presence of the inhibitor was evaluated from the following Arrhenius equation [12] and the values obtained are presented in Table 2:

where p₁ and p₂ are rate of corrosion at temperatures T₁ and T₂ respectively.

Arrhenius plot for the corrosion rate of brass in the presence of CAE for 3 h and 6 h are given in Fig. 1 (a) – (b). Straight lines were obtained from the plot of Log P Vs. 1/T with slope equal to – E_a / 2.303 R. Note first that the E_a values are low, indicating fast corrosion of brass in both the solutions [13]. The estimated values of E_a for brass corrosion in the presence of CAE are listed in the Table 2. The values of E_a > 80 KJ/mol indicate chemical adsorption where as E_a < 80 KJ/mol infer physical adsorption. The E_a values indicate that the process is activation controlled. In the present study, the E_a values support the fact that the inhibitors are physically adsorbed on brass surface. The estimated E_a in the presence of inhibitor infer that the interaction between the metal surface and the inhibitor was found to be strong enough to reduce corrosion [13]. In addition, the E_a values increases in the same order as the inhibition efficiency. This indicates that the energy barrier for the corrosion reaction increases in the presence of inhibitor in the acid solutions, the corrosion reaction will be further pushed to surface sites that are characterized by higher values of E_a indicating that corrosion occurs at the uncovered part of the surface [14].

Click on image to enlarge

Figure1: Arrhenius plot for 0.1 N H₃PO₄ with different concentrations of CAE for different times

Free energy of adsorption

The free energy of adsorption ΔG_ads were obtained from the following equations and the values obtained are presented in Table 2:

where Φ is surface coverage on the metal surface, C is the concentration of inhibitor in mol/l,   and K is equilibrium constant.

Results obtained indicate that the values of ∆G_ads arenegative in all cases, indicating that the CAE is strongly adsorbed on the brass surface [14]. The value of ∆G_ads indicates that the inhibitor functions by physically adsorbing on the surface of the brass. Generally values of ∆G_ads upto the -29.53 KJmol^-1 are consistent with electrostatic interaction between charged molecules and a charged metal, while those more negative than the -40 KJmol^-1 involve charge sharing or transfer from the inhibitor molecules to the metal surface to form a co-ordinate type of bond [15]. Physical adsorption is a result of electrostatic attraction between charged metal surface and charged species in the bulk of the solution. Adsorption of negatively charged species can also protect the positively charged metal surface acting with a negatively charged intermediate such as acid anions adsorbed on the metal surface [6].

Entropy and enthalpy

Kinetic parameters such as enthalpy (ΔH) and entropy (ΔS) of activation of corrosion process is calculated from the following thermodynamic basic equations and the values obtained are presented in Table 2:

Table 2 – Calculated activation energy (E_a), free energy of adsorption (∆G_ads), enthalpy change (∆H), entropy change (∆S) values for CAE on brass corrosion in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ at 300 K

Conc. of inhibitor (%)	Ea  from Eq. (1) (kJ/mol)	Ea  from Arrhenius Plot (kJ/mol)	∆Gads (kJ/mol)	∆H (kJ/mol)	∆S (mol/kJ)
For 3 Hours
Blank	12.91	12.98	0	0	0
0.0001	18.48	19.15	-29.53	-24.75	0.0159
0.0002	20.33	21.27	-27.74	-24.73	0.0100
0.0003	28.42	22.09	-26.16	-24.72	0.0068
0.0004	34.18	27.92	-24.50	-24.66	0.0035
0.0005	53.23	37.46	-21.50	-24.58	0.0011
For 6 Hours
Blank	21.00	16.75	0	0	0
0.0001	26.15	23.93	-29.40	-24.70	0.0157
0.0002	26.72	26.59	-27.74	-24.68	0.0102
0.0003	27.34	28.72	-26.78	-24.66	0.0071
0.0004	33.37	31.91	-25.94	-24.62	0.0044
0.0005	40.96	35.90	-24.66	-24.58	0.0003

 

ΔH  =  E_a – RT                                          (8)

ΔG_ads  =  ΔH – TΔS                                 (9)

Enthalpy of activation of absolute values lower than the -24.75 KJmol^-1 indicates physical adsorption, and the values approaching 100 KJmol^-1 indicate chemical adsorption. In this study, the values of ΔH are lower than the -24.75 KJmol^-1 confirming physical adsorption on the acid solutions [10]. The negative values of ΔH also show that the adsorption of inhibitor is an exothermic process [14].

The ΔS values are positive for the acidic bath. This implies that the activation complex is the rate determining step representing association rather than dissociation, indicating that a decrease in disorder takes place on going from reactant to the activated complex [10].

Rate constant and half life

Fig. 2 show the plots of log W_f (final weight loss) obtained in weight-loss studies vs. time in days for the brass dissolution. From the plots, the values of rate constant and half-life were evaluated using the following equations [16,17] and the values obtained are presented in Table 3:

Table 3 – Calculated rate constant (k) and half-life period (t_1/2) values for CAE on brass corrosion in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ at 300 K

Conc. of inhibitor (%)	Rate constant (sec-1)	Half-life Period (sec)
0.0001	0.6096	1.1368
0.0002	0.6280	1.1035
0.0003	0.6580	1.0532
0.0004	0.6773	1.0232
0.0005	0.7086	0.9779

 

Rate constant (k)    =  2.303 x slope (sec^-1)                   (10) 

 

Click on image to enlarge

Figure 2 – Plot of log W_f vs. time (days) for 0.1 N H₃PO₄ with different concentrations of CAE

In this study, linear plots were obtained, which indicates first order kinetics [9]. In this study the rate constant values were decreased where as the half-life values were increased with increasing concentration of CAE.

Adsorption isotherms

The values of surface coverage for different concentrations of the CAE at 300 K have been used to identify the best isotherm for the adsorption process. The adsorption of organic adsorbate on the surface of copper is regarded as substitutional process between the organic compound in the aqueous phase org_aq and the water molecules adsorbed on the copper surface (H₂O)_ads [18]_.

Org_(aq) + x (H₂O)_(ads)→ Org_(ads) + x H₂O_(aq)

where x is the size ratio, that is the number of water molecules displaced by one molecule of organic inhibitor. Attempts were made to fit Ѳ values of various isotherms, including Langmuir, Freundlich, Temkin and Frumkin isotherms. By far the results were best fitted by Temkin adsorption isotherm. The Temkin adsorption isotherm is given by the following equation (12):

Ln kC = aѲ                                                     (12)

where k is the equilibrium constant of the adsorption reaction, C is the inhibitor concentration in the bulk of the solution and a is the molecule interaction parameters depending upon molecular interactions in the adsorption layer and the degree of heterogeneity of the metal surface. The plot of Ѳ against log C for all additives gives straight lines, as shown in Fig. 3: (a) – (b). This indicates that these compounds are adsorbed on the surface of brass according to Temkin adsorption isotherm [19,20].

Click on image to enlarge

Figure 3 – Temkin’s adsorption isotherm plot for 0.1 N H₃PO₄ with different concentrations of CAE for different times

Potentiostatic polarization studies

Fig. 4 shows the cathodic and anodic polarization curves of brass in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ with and without addition different concentrations of CAE. Table 4 gives the values of associated electrochemical parameters. The i_corr values decreased with increasing concentration of inhibitor. The values of anodic Tafel slope (b_a) and cathodic Tafel slope (b_c) of CAE added solutions are found to change with inhibitor concentration, which clearly indicates that the inhibitors controlled both the anodic and cathodic reactions. The IE of CAE attained a maximum value at 0.0005 % concentration of inhibitor. The values of IE increased with increasing concentration of inhibitor, indicating that a higher surface coverage was obtained in solution with optimum concentration of inhibitor. The effect of the anodic polarization behavior of brass (Fig. 4) suggests that protective films formed on the metal surface can alter anodic dissolution in solution shows that CAE formed a film that acted as a barrier to protect the metal surface [19-21].

Click on image to enlarge

Figure 4 – Polarization curves for brass in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ with different concentrations of CAE

Table 4 – Electrochemical parameters and inhibition efficiency (IE) for corrosion of brass in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ containing different concentrations of CAE

Conc. of inhibitor (%)	OCP (mV) vs. SCE	Ecorr (mV) vs. SCE	Tafel constants		icorr (mA/cm2)	IE (%)
			ba (mV/dec)	bc (mV/dec)
Blank	-193	-190	300	100	310	0
0.0001	-205	-210	290	95	300	3.25
0.0002	-225	-220	160	150	240	22.58
0.0003	-230	-232	80	130	200	35.48
0.0004	-250	-245	40	160	100	67.74
0.0005	-265	-257	20	185	70	87.25

 

AC Impedance Measurements

AC impedance spectroscopy has been shown to be a powerful tool to study the corrosion process of metals in different environments and to characterize the inhibition ability of a corrosion inhibitor, which is related to the charge transfer resistance (R_ct). The double layer capacitance (C_dl) can also be used to determine the inhibition ability. The inhibition performance of an organic or natural substance on a metal surface depends not only on the chemical structure of the organic substance and the nature of the metal, but also on the experimental conditions such as the immersion time and concentration of the adsorbent.

The corrosion behavior of brass, in acidic solution with and without CAE is also investigated by AC impedance measurements at 300 K (Fig. 5). The impedance parameters and the IE % derived from the investigation are mentioned given in Table 5. As it can be seen from Figure 5:, impedance diagrams show a semi-circular appearance, indicating that a charge transfer process mainly controls the corrosion of brass. From the impedance data, we notice an increase in the charge transfer resistance and decrease of the double layer capacitance with increasing the inhibitor concentration, indicating that CAE inhibits the corrosion rate of brass by an adsorption mechanism. Therefore, the decrease in the C_dl value can be attributed to a decrease in the local dielectric constant and/or an increase in the thickness of the electrical double layer, suggesting that the inhibitor molecules act by adsorption at the metal/solution interface as a consequence of the replacement of water molecules by the inhibitor molecules [8].

Click on image to enlarge

Figure 5 – Nyquist plots of brass in 0.1N H₃PO₄ with different concentrations of CAE

Table 5 – AC Impedance parameters and inhibition efficiency (IE) for corrosion of brass in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ containing different concentrations of CAE

Conc. of inhibitor (%)	Rct (ohm cm2)	Cdl (mF/cm2)	IE (%)
Blank	150.60	5.74	00.00
0.0001	444.25	2.53	66.10
0.0002	579.98	2.07	74.03
0.0003	945.75	1.35	84.08
0.0004	1370.67	0.99	89.01
0.0005	3812.17	0.36	96.05

 

A comparison may be made between the inhibition efficiency values obtained by different methods (weight loss, potentiostatic polarization and AC impedance methods). We can see that whatever the method used, no significant changes are observed in IE % values. We can then conclude that there is a good agreement with the three methods used in this study at all tested concentrations and that the acid extract of Chaetomorpha antennia acts as green inhibitor for the corrosion of brass 0.1 N H₃PO₄.

Scanning Electron Microscopy

SEM micrograms of the polished surface of brass exposed for 6 h in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ in absence and presence of CAE are shown in Figure 6: (a)-(b) shows the surface morphology of brass formed in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ without and with CAE for 6 h. In the comparison of the SEM micrograms, there were a rough surface on brass in absence of extract and a smooth surface with deposited extract in presence of the CAE. This confirms that the extract inhibited corrosion of brass through adsorption of the inhibitor molecules on metal surface. After immersing in the inhibitor containing solution, the entire metal surface was covered with a layer formed with inhibitor as a barrier to corrosion, as denoted by rougher over abrasions [22,23].

Click on image to enlarge

Figure6: SEM images of brass surface after 6 h immersion in 0.1N H₃PO₄ in the absence (a) and presence (b) of CAE

Conclusions

The CAE inhibition efficiency on brass corrosion in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ increases on increasing concentration of the extract and decreases with rise in temperature. Adsorption of the extract on brass surface is found to obey Temkin adsorption isotherm. The increase in the values of activation energies in the presence of extract indicates that CAE creates a physical barrier to charge and mass transfer, leading to reduction in corrosion rate of brass in 0.1 N H₃PO₄. The negative values of ΔG_ads and ΔH highlight that the inhibition of corrosion of brass through adsorption is spontaneous, physical and exothermic. Potentiodynamic polarization measurements show that CAE acts as a mixed type inhibitor. Inhibition efficiency values were found to show good trend with weight-loss method, potentiodynamic polarization and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy studies. SEM and impedance spectroscopy studies confirm that corrosion inhibition of brass in 0.1 N H₃PO₄ is due to adsorption of the CAE extract on brass.

References

1. Chandrasekaran V. , Kannan K.  and Natesan M. , Asian J. Chem., 17(3), I921 ( 2005).
2. V. Chandrasekaran, K. Kannan and M. Natesan, Orient. J. Chem., 21(1), 81 (2005).
3. Ranjana and Nandi M. M., Ind. J. Chem. Tech., 18, 29 (2011).
4. Ranjana, Ranu Banerjiee and Nandi M. M., Ind. J. Chem. Tech., 20, 237 (2013).
5. Ravichandran R.  and Rajendran N., App. Surf. Sci., 241, 449 (2005).
   CrossRef
6. Vijayalakshmi P. R., Rajalakshmi R. and Subhashini S., Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 29(1), 9 (2011).
   CrossRef
7. Ramananda, Mayanglambam S., Vivek Sharma and Gurmeet Singh, Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 29(6), 405 (2011).
8. Khadraoui A., Khelifa A., Boutoumi H., Mettai  B., Karzazi Y. and Hammouti B., Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 32(4), 271 (2014).
   CrossRef
9. Ejikeme P. M., Umana S. G.  and Onukwuli O. D., Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 30(5), 317 (2012).
   CrossRef
10. Muna K. Irshedat, Eyad M. Nawafleh, Tareq T. Bataineh, Riyadh Muhaidat, Mahmoud A. Al-Qudah and Ahmed A. Alomary, Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 31(1),  1 (2011).
11. Ravichandran R.  and Rajendran N., App. Surf. Sci., 241, 449 (2011).
    CrossRef
12. V. Chandrasekaran and Saravanan, Corr. Sci. and Tech., 5(5), 160 (2006).
13. Mahmoud S. S., Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 24, 441 (2006).
    CrossRef
14. Elmsellem H., Basbas N., Chetouani A., Aouniti A., Radi  S., Messali M. and Hammouti B., Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 32(2), 77 (2014).
    CrossRef
15. Tadeja Kosec, Ingrid Milosev and Boris Pihlar, App. Surf. Sci., 253, 8863 (2014).
    CrossRef
16. Chandrasekaran V., Kannan K. and Natesan M., Corr. Sci. and Tech., 4(5), 191 (2005).
17. Al-Mhyawi S. R., Orient. J. Chem., 30(2), 541 (2014).
    CrossRef
18. Megahed H. E., Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 29(4), 287 (2011).
    CrossRef
19. Chandrasekaran V. and Gokulalakshmi K., Bull. Electrochem., 22, 379, (2006).
20. Chandrasekaran V., Kannan K.  and Natesan M., Int. J. Pure and App. Chem., l(1), 101 (2006).
21. Gaikwad A. B., Patil P.P. and Sudeshna Chaudhari, Curr. App. Phy., 9, 206 (2009).
    CrossRef
22. Ramananda, Mayanglambam S., Vivek Sharma and Gurmeet Singh , Portu. Electrochim. Acta., 29(6), 405 (2011).
23. Khadraoui A., Khelifa A., Boutoumi H., Mettai B., Karzazi Y. and Hammouti B., Portu.  Electrochim. Acta., 32(4), 271 (2014).
    CrossRef

---

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.