Views 
   PDF Download PDF Downloads: 809

 Open Access -   Download full article: 

On Characterization of Non-Commutative Minkowski Space Time

Dharmendra Kumar1 and Sunil KumarYadav2

¹Department of Physics, K.B. Womens College, Madhepura, India.

²Department of Physics, C.N. College, Ramgarh, India.

DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.13005/msri/090117

Article Publishing History
Article Received on : 12 June 2012
Article Accepted on : 05 July 2012
Article Published :
Plagiarism Check: No
Article Metrics
ABSTRACT:

The present study aims to derive modified geodesic equation in non-commutative space time. Snyder developed a model for non-commutative space time which provides a suitable technique of quantum structure of the space. We extend Tetrad formulation of general relativity to non-commutative case for complex gravity models. We derive geodesic equation on the k-space time in Non-commutative space, which is a generalization of Feynman’s approach. It has been shown that the homogeneous Maxwell’s equations may be derived by starting with the Newton’s force equation and generalized to relativistic. We show that the geodesic equation in the commutative space time is a suitable for generalization to κ -space time in κ -deformed space time. It shown that the κ-dependent correction to geodesic equation is cubic in velocities.

KEYWORDS: Geodesic; Non-commutative; Space time; Newtonian; Gravity model; Feynmann; Deformed

Copy the following to cite this article:

Kumar D, Yadav S. K. On Characterization of Non-commutative Minkowski Space Time. Mat.Sci.Res.India;9(1)


Copy the following to cite this URL:

Kumar D, Yadav S. K. On Characterization of Non-commutative Minkowski Space Time. Mat.Sci.Res.India;9(1). Available from: http://www.materialsciencejournal.org/?p=1205


Introduction

Several field theory models on k- space time have been constructed , using different techniques such as by F. Mejer and J Lukierski specially in, scalar field theory on k-Minkowski space. It has been shown by S. Tanimutra that in the flat space time, Feynman approach and minimal coupling method are equivalent which is usefull to derive the general equation of motion for a charged particle. We discuss here the applicability of Feynman approach for the case of general relativity, resulting in the derivation of the geodesic equation. We generalize the procedure for k-Minkowski space. We obtain here corrections to the geodesic equation due to the k-deformation of space time , up to the first order in the deformation parameter. WE know that a relativistic particle of mass m and electric charge e is described by in 4D-Minkowski space, where xμ(τ)  in 4D- Minkowski space, where τ is a parameter. Let us write the following relations

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq1

Where pμ = mx + eAμ is the canonical momentum operator, Fμ = mx, the forceμν the electromagnetic strength tensor, Aμ is a gauge field and Φ(x) is an arbitrary function odfx. We deal with gravity only, which do not require the gauge field. We only evaluate particles with no electric charge, which for a neutral particle we obtain the following equations.

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq2

Φ(x) = 0 to find the correct geodesic equation.M. Montesinos obtained that the generalization from flat to curved space by taking Eq.(1) as valid in a local Lorenz frame of reference and effect of gravity is brought in by replacing the Minkowskian metric nμν with an arbitrary metric  gμν (X).  He has shown that this assumption leads to geodesic equation. We choose 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq3

Let  us assume that the ‘metric’ gμ(x) is a function of operator X which is a symmetric tensor.

Theorem (Generalization of Commutative Space Time )

Let Xμ(τ) be a new position operator and pμ(τ)  is  the  corresponding conjugate momenta, mXμ = Pμ, then solution of equation may be obtain in terms of the operators given in (2). Proof

We construct operators X and P expressed as follows.

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq4

Where xμ and pν  satisfy relation. By taking the derivative with respect to of Eqs.(4), we obtain the following relation.

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq5

Where pμ = mXμ . Combining equations (5) and (2) we obtain

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq6

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqA

Combining equations (3), (5), (6), we obtain the equation

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq7

By choosing the operator X such that is Xμ = Xμ  (x,p), LHS  of  (7)  reduces  to the equation

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqb

We now integrate Eq. (6) over pμ  which gives the relation

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqc

By taking Gν(x) = 0 we get

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq8

Where all Jacobi identities are satisfied. Eq. (6) is similar to the Christoffel symbol in general relativity, and Eq. (8) is similar to the geodesic equation. Let us assume that ‘metric’ is invertible and define an inverse of the symmetric tensor by the following relation

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq9

Combining the equations (4), (7) and (9) we get

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqc

Where

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqd

is really the Christoffelsymbol, we get the geodesic equation

 vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq10

Where vgμ tensor is treated only as a symmetric tensor with an inverse defined in Eq. (10).

Theorem (Derivation of Geodric Equation In K- Minkowski Space Time)

We derive the geodesic equation for a particle moving in the non-commutative curved space time and analyze the k-Minkowski deformations of gravity. The methods taken here use k-Minkowskideformations on the flat space time. It is further generalized to k-deformed space time with arbitrary metric.

Proof

Let us define k-Minkowski space by the relation

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqdd

Operators  

 vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqs

care expressed in terms of operators x and using the derivations due to J. Lukerki and H. Ruegg. We get

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqe

Where 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqf

satisfy the identity 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq12

Let us solve Eq. (11) up to the first order in deformation parameter a, which gives

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqg

Where parameters of the realization a, b, and g satisfy the a constraint

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqh

Let  us  define an  operator 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqi

which commutes with

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqj

, i.e.

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqk

Any function of ˆy also commutes with

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq13

Where we take only first order in the modified form of give 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eql

and 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqm

up to the first order in

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqn

The canonical momentum operator ( in e = 0 case )

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqo

as derived by the relation

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq14

Hence , we conclude that construction due to E. HariKumar via Feynman approach satisfy all Jacobi identities. The condition that comes by taking the derivative of Eq. (12) with respect to τ is

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqp

Hence the geodesic equation in the k- Minkowski space time is established.

Theorem ( k-Dependent Corrections to the Geodesic Equation )

Proof

Let us choose the conjugate pairs (x , p ) and for flat non-commutative space time, 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqq

in commutative and non- commutative space respectively. It is shown that all the operators in the flat non-commutative space time are expressed in terms of x , p and deformation parameter a. For the non-commutative space time with curvature. Let us construct it as functions of x , p and deformation parameter . In case of neutral particles , conjugate momenta is  given by  

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqt

We derive the corrections to the geodesic equation due to the k- deformation of space time. Let us consider the relation.

vol9_no1_cha_dha_equ

Where

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqv

And

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqw

satisfies Eq. (12).

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqx

satisfy all the Jacobi Indentifies and the relation 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqy

But in the limit a ®0, it implies that

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eqz

By taking limit 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_A

we get the following relations

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_B

Combining   these  equation, and comparing it with (13) & (14)

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_C

substitute

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_D
 
with a function that commutes with
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_E
 
That is with
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_F
 
Thus , we obtain the required form 
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq16

By an appropriate application of (14), we find that this construction satisfioes all Jacobi identities and Eq. (15) is also satisfied to all orders in a

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_C

Hence , get its modified form as follows 
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_G
 

An alternative construction of the operator up to the first order in the deformation parameter may be obtained by differentiating Eq. (17) with respect to τ.

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_H

It satisfies antisymmetric part of

 vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_I

We write it as follows
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_J
 
Where
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_K
 
and
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_L
Combining Eq. (16) and (17), We get
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_18
 
By taking the limit a a →0, we obtain
 vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_M
Hence , the case of up to the first order in the deformation parameter a
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_N
i.e.
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_O
Here 
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_P

and we get the following relations

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_Q

We get constraints on 

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_R

that the Jacobi identities must be satisfied up to the first order in a.
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_S
 
We get
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_T
 
Let us construct
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_R
 
from

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_V 

and

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_W

and express it as

vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_X

Hence
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_Y
is determined by  the parameters a and b and four
 
More free parameters. This general used form but valid up to the first order in the deformation
parameter a. The construction
 vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_Z

where is the special case of this general procedure.

Conclusion

The principal characteristic of this approach is that all the corrections depend on the choice of realization of the parameters on the mass of the test particle.
 
We analysed here the a-dependent correction to the Newtonian limit of the geodesic equation which shows that the Newtonian force/potential remains radial, but depends on the mass of the test particle.
 
We have shown here that the κ-deformed commutation relations between phase space  variables induce modified incertainty relations 
 
It has been shown that the commutative limit
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_A1
  gives rise to the metric
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_A2
 and by analogy, we interpret 
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_A3    
 non- commutative metric  .
vol9_no1_cha_dha_eq_A4
References
  1. H.S Synder, Phys. Rev. 7: 1-38 (1947).
  2.  R. Wald, General relativity University of Chicago Press (1948).
  3.  Jacques Bros., The Geometry of Relativistic Space time Seminaire Poincare1 (1-45) (2005).
  4. S. Caroll, Space time and Geometry an Introduction to general relativity (2003).
  5. J. Lukierski and H. Ruegg. A. Nowieki Phys. Lett. B293: 344 (1992)
    CrossRef
  6.  S. Kresic-Jurie, S. Meljanae and M. Stojic J. Phys. A42: 365204 (2009)
    CrossRef
  7.  S. Tanimura, Annals of Physics 220: 229 (1992).
    CrossRef
  8. E. HariKumar, M., Mod Sivakumar and N. Srinivas . Phys. Lett. A26: 1103 (2011)
Share Button

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.